From: Damian Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If it were allowed, it would probably be done
> via properties instead:
> 
>  sub hidden (str $name, int $force, int $override is aka($force))
>    { ... }
Would the following be simpler...?

 sub hidden (str $name, int $force is aka($override))
   { ... }

Damian's statement says to me that there is an argument named $force, and
another argument named $override which is also known as $force... that
sounds conflicting.  The revised statement simply says that there's an
argument named $force and it is also known as $override.

BTW, the aka thing is cool.  It could be complementary to "is named":

 # can't use force_tainted as argument:
 sub hidden (int $force_tainted is named($force))

 # can use force_tainted as argument:
 sub hidden (int $force_tainted is aka($force))



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


Reply via email to