I ran some quick time tests on the GC, and hashes are relatively
expensive to GC, relative to other things. (They're an order of
magnitude slower than perlstrings, and two orders of magitude slower
than perlints) They're slow enough that I'd like to take a look at
them to see if perhaps there's a way to have less GC overhead...
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
