Andy Dougherty wrote: > I note that currently imcc uses Bison and Flex. Is there any compelling > reason for this? I've sort of got it working with Sun's yacc and flex. Do > folks think it would be worthwhile for me to polish things up a bit and > post patches so it builds fine with either?
Send them in please. > Or is the use of Bison/Flex a temporary convenience not intended for > general consumption and not worth worrying about? yacc, bison, whatever it's called, it should compile the grammar. > [Historical aside: One issue with some parsers is how well they handle > stack overflow (often set by YYMAXDEPTH). The grammar is simple, I can see no reason where we could reach this limit. leo
