At 6:16 PM -0400 8/20/02, John Porter wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> I expect a UINTVAL should be sufficient to hold the counter.
>
>Why? Because you don't expect a perl process to run longer
>than a couple hours? Or because rollover won't matter?
Rollover won't really matter much, if we're careful with how we
document things. Still, a UINTVAL should be at least 2^32--do you
really think we'll have that many GC generations in a few hours?
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
