At 8:53 AM +0000 8/17/02, Mike Lambert (via RT) wrote:
>
>However, in the interest of saving someone from updating yet-another COW
>patch in the long-distant future because this wasn't applied (similar to
>how Peter's patch got left to bit-rot), can we try to reach a closure on
>this patch (either apply or don't apply) so that further development may
>continue?
I want COW, but I'm not thrilled at the performance loss--that worries me.
Can you come up with some memory usage numbers, so I've something to
feel mildly better about? (Perhaps on a more complex example, or with
some of the BASIC programs or something?)
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
