At 5:45 PM +0100 8/11/02, Tom Hughes wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does anybody know the _keyed_int PMC methods take the key as a pointer
>> to an INTVAL instead of a straight INTVAL?
>>
>> It doesn't seem to make any sense so unless somebody knows of a reason
>> for it I plan to change it as part of my keyed access patch...
>
>I think I may have worked out the answer to this myself - some of
>the PMC methods which take more than one key rely on a null pointer
>being used to indicate that there is no key.
>
>On a separate point, why do we have set_number but push_float?
Bad memory and inconsistent specifications to implementors? :)
It should all be _number.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
