On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:43:25PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote: > now thinking that we ought to have a default.pmc that throws "not > supported" for everything, but move all of the current fallback > implementations into a new class and reparent a bunch of the existing > PMCs (probably all of the non-aggregates?). The hard part will be > coming up with a name for it...
DWIM.pmc? On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:19:03PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: Because it can always be recovered from CVS if we decide that it's useful and what name it should have :-) Nicholas Clark
