At 10:00 AM +0200 8/9/02, Josef Hook wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> At 9:40 AM +0200 8/9/02, Josef Hook wrote:
>> >I hate to bring this up again but i must. Dan what's the status on my
>> >matrix patch ? I would apreciate some feedback if its good or bad?
>> >If its going to be applied or not?
>> >Do you want me to change anything?
>>
>> Sorry--you were going to redo this as a standalone PMC class, right?
>> I'm pretty sure that was the plan.
>
>I thought you werent sure wether you wanted it in the core or not.
>I guess i gave a hint that i could put everything in matrix.pmc but i
>didnt got the message that i should (my fault). Anyway you want most of
>the code in matrix.pmc ? no more matrix_core.c matrix_core.h?
>Could i keep cell.c and cell.h in core as is ?
>It would make it easier as i use them in multiarray.pmc
Sorry, I probably wasn't clear. :(
What I wanted originally was everything in a single file, as
matrix.pmc. While I'm considering other things now, I'm not sure if
that might not be because it's really late.
If putting all the code into matrix.pmc is going to be a problem,
this'd be the time for us to come up with a scheme for multi-file PMC
classes. I'm not sure what, if anything, we'll do to facilitate
code-sharing between PMC classes, but I don't think putting things
into the core code is the right answer for that.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
