On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 04:50:25PM +0200, Aldo Calpini wrote: > Mr. Nobody wrote: > > The windows 9x command.com shell dosen't recognize > > 2>&1 so it ends up passing "2" as an argument to the > > compiler, which fails because there's no such file. > > this is no news. you can't even build Perl on 9x. > IMHO, *build* platform targets should not include 9x. > build it on NT/2000/XP and then feel free to use the > binary on 9x (as Perl actually does).
Nikola Knezevic ( indy at tesla.rcub.bg.ac.yu ) was certainly managing it last year, and was reporting to p5p on progresses with clearing up regression test failures. I think he wasn't using the 9x command.com shell though. Nicholas Clark
