Melvin Smith wrote: > What parts particularly bug you? Maybe we can address a few.
Well, basically, AFAICT, virtually none of the parrot code is adequately documented. So, pick a random entry point. :-) But this is why I'm not suggesting that someone drop what they're doing and going in and document like crazy. I'm suggesting that each person, before he checks in a file, take a look and see if there isn't some way the doco in that file could be improved/enlarged. I don't think that's too much to ask; do you? Btw, none of this should be taken as a criticism of the dedication and quality that have gone into the parrot project so far. There just seems to be this one area that people are neglecting, one which could have significant impact down the road as you guys grow old and retire. :-) Now, I know I'm not the PHB-designate, and I don't want to usurp his role... so, uh, HFB^WPHB, if you want me to cool it, I will. :-) -- John Douglas Porter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com
