On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Josh Wilmes wrote: > At 8:55 on 07/05/2002 CDT, "David M. Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It got removed because it wasn't in the spec... Dan directed that we > > replace it with a version of init that accepts a PMC argument > > (init_pmc_method_t) that can be used to send in initial size or whatever > > else you can dream up. > > In that case, can the extra int be removed from the remaining ones?
>From the perspective of PDD02, yes. What that will do to those PMCs though, I don't know. - D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>