On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:49:27PM -0400, Melvin Smith wrote: > >- Each co-routine should probably have its own interpreter. > > I'm not sure about this one. I think we can accomplish it without > the full overhead of a new interpreter.
I don't understand. It should not be much more expansive to create a interpreter than to copy a context, especially when you also need to allocate some new stacks. So, it should be ok to create an new interpreter each time a co-routine is started. And then, switching between the co-routine and its caller is just a matter of modifiying the "interpreter" pointer. -- Jerome
