At 7:21 PM +0100 6/12/02, Tom Hughes wrote:
>In message <a05111b2fb92c9ba1ac83@[63.120.19.221]>
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The exported name should be the MD5 checksum of a string that
>> represents the actual routine name we're looking for. This, I think,
>> should be specified somewhere external to the library, in some sort
>> of metadata file, I think. (Not sure, I'm waffling here. But we need
>> this to be unique)
>
>Why does it need to be unique if it's not going to be linked
>against anything? If you're just finding the name with dlsym() or
>equivalent then you can just use the same name in all the libraries
>and it won't clash.
I'm pretty sure this'll run us into problems in some places. I'm
trying to dig up some details at the moment.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
