On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 01:39:56PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 12:55 AM -0400 6/8/02, Josh Wilmes wrote: > > > >Although I should mention that it's not verifying the presence of these > >headers- it just assumes they are available. It does that because the > >intent is to use this has_header.h for miniparrot, where we won't be doing > >any probing. The assumption is that if C89 says it will be there, it will > >be there, darn it. > > This is perfectly fine. We're assuming a minimum C89 level of ANSI > compiler compliance.
hosted, or freestanding? [arrgh? were those the correct terms? the minimal one doesn't have errno.h or most of the other headers, IIRC. And wince is only the minimal one] Nicholas Clark -- Even better than the real thing: http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/
