At 08:30 PM 6/8/2002 +0200, Jerome Vouillon wrote: >On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 07:40:14PM -0400, Melvin Smith wrote: > > The support isn't complete, for example, co-routines, etc. need to > > swap in their own context, which right now they don't do. > >Instead of using some space on the stack, co-routines can store all >their local variables into their closure. Then, there is no need to >swap in any context.
At more risk of admitting more of my ignorance... We have to store the closure's variables somewhere, if not on a stack, where? -Melvin
