Steve Fink writes: >What about followups? The way I've settled on doing things is to send >only to the bugs address initially, but then reply to both bugs and >the list for any followup correspondence. I know that replying to just >the bugs address isn't enough because it only forwards the initial >message to the list. Is replying to just the list enough? (Does the >bug tracker see list messages and grab out things with a netlabs >tag?)
Yes. Replying to the list is enough. The tracker follows the list and notes things with a netlabs tag. >If it is enough to just reply to the list, could the bug tracker add a >Mail-Followup-To: header to reflect that? (See any of Simon Cozen's >messages for an example.) Mutt, at least, will respect that header >when you do a group reply. Ok, I've added a Mail-Followup-To: for new tickets to follow up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I'm not convinced this is totally the right answer, but we can try it and see what happens. There may be some tweaks that still need to be done. >And maybe this is just me, but could the [netlabs ...] tag be placed >at the end of the subject line instead of the beginning? I'd rather not - some mailers truncate subject lines. -R
