At 3:55 PM -0400 4/23/02, Simon Glover wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> At 12:25 PM +0200 4/19/02, Peter Gibbs wrote:
>> >Mike Lambert wrote:
>>
>> >This effect is exacerbated by the fact that "set S1, S2" does a
>> >string_copy - I am still not sure what is supposed to happen
>>here; I believe
>> >that the pure set opcode should just be doing a register copy?? There is a
>> >clone opcode which also does a string_copy, which seems reasonable.
>>
>> set S0, S1 is broken. I'm fixing that now.
>
> And here's a test for that. (By the way, is there any way to test it more
> directly?)
Applied, thanks. (And no, not at the moment)
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
