On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Simon Glover wrote: # >+ cstring[s->buflen + 1] = 0; good grief
# > # # This is a buffer overflow; I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do, # but this certainly doesn't do it. shouldnt cstring[s->bufused +1] = \0 to keep us from clobbering the last char? or will string_grow update bufused even though we havent 'used' it just yet? Roman
