At 8:58 AM -0700 4/14/02, Robert Spier wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> At 11:47 PM -0700 4/13/02, Robert Spier wrote:
>>> Looks like we've got a slew of gcc3 issues (which don't show up on the
>>> tinderboxes, cause nobody's running a gcc3 box.)
>> What sub-version of GCC 3?
>
>3.0.4
>
>(running on a relatively stock Pentium2 / RH7.2 system.)
Damn. Do the failing tests segfault?
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
