On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:12:56PM -0700, David Whipp wrote: > Mark J. Reed wrote > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:03:45PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote: > > > ..class.m2: # call static m2 within m1's class, regardless > > of how m1 was called > > Typo. That should be just .class.m2, only one leading '.'. > > Wouldn't that be the current topic's class? .. . . and not necessarily the class in which m1 was declared. Good point. I was assuming a simpler, inheritance-free case.
-- Mark J. REED <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
