Dan Sugalski writes:
: At 3:11 PM -0800 4/3/02, Larry Wall wrote:
: >Piers Cawley writes:
: >: Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: >:
: >: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:27:10AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: >: >> They are assumed to be declared in alphabetical order.  Whoa! you say,
: >: >> that could get confusing.  It surely can.  But if you're doing
: >: >> something complicated enough that alphabetical order would be
: >: >> confusing, don't use this shorthand. 
: >: >
: >: > Alphabetically or asciibetically?  I mean, are these functionally
: >: > equivalent?
: >
: >It's utf8ical, actually.
: 
: That should be Unicodely, I expect. But strict unicode sorting, or do 
: we respect the locale?

Strict, but doesn't really matter.  Nobody sane will use anything other
than $^a and $^b.

Larry

Reply via email to