At 10:07 AM -0500 3/30/02, Josh Wilmes wrote: >Someone said that ICU requires a C++ compiler. That's concerning to me, >as is the issue of how we bootstrap our build process. We were planning >on a platform-neutral miniparrot, and IMHO that can't include ICU (as i'm >sure it's not going to be written in pure ansi C)
If the C++ bits are redoable as C, I'm OK with it. I've not taken a good look at it to know how much it depends on C++. If it's mostly // comments and such we can work around the issues easily enough. If its objects, well, I suppose it depends on how much it relies on them. >At 8:45 on 03/30/2002 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At 4:32 PM -0800 3/25/02, Brent Dax wrote: >> >I *really* strongly suggest we include ICU in the distribution. I >> >recently had to turn off mod_ssl in the Apache 2 distro because I >> >couldn't get OpenSSL downloaded and configured. >> >> FWIW, ICU in the distribution is a given if we use it. >> >> Parrot will require a C compiler and link tools (maybe make, but >> maybe not) to build on a target platform and nothing else. If we rely > > on ICU we must ship with it. -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk