> > At one point I heard someone in charge say that NULLs were treated > > as invalid internal state and a routine was not obligated to check for > > NULL registers. > > > > If this is no longer the case, or never was, then I was either mistaken or > > missed the email. Especially since I was arguing _for_ NULLs :) > >That's what confused me too. But now I think that must have been for >PMC registers only, not string registers.
Boy a searchable archive would be nifty right about now. Might be time for me to slurp the archive down to a local copy. -Melvin
