On Friday 22 March 2002 08:22, Clinton A. Pierce wrote: > Some patches committed last evening nearly took care of the problem -- at > least they appeared to make my small example appear to > work. Sometimes. :) Here's a slightly larger but better example that so > far hasn't failed to show the stack corruption problem anywhere:
Here's my output: Whammo 26> parrot clint2.pbc one<-- save ( ;boundary) two<-- save ( ;boundary) three<-- save ( ;boundary) four<-- save ( ;boundary) five<-- save ( ;boundary) six<-- save ( ;boundary) seven<-- save ( ;boundary) eight<-- save ( ;boundary) nine<-- save ( ;boundary) ten<-- save ( ;boundary) eleven<--saved (endproc) -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
