Simon Cozens writes: : Larry Wall: : > Not the same concept exactly. I think a C<break> within a C<for> loop : > would be the same as a C<next>, not a C<last>. : : Doesn't this break C and Shell resonance?
We've done that before. :-) Larry
Simon Cozens writes: : Larry Wall: : > Not the same concept exactly. I think a C<break> within a C<for> loop : > would be the same as a C<next>, not a C<last>. : : Doesn't this break C and Shell resonance?
We've done that before. :-) Larry