On Saturday 23 February 2002 23:20, Brent Dax wrote: > The Right Answer is probably to change all the STRING*s in the core to > Parrot_Strings. However, there are two problems with that:
I think that's the recommended school of thought, although I've always preferred *not* to typedef the final pointer. It makes it a little clearer to me what I'm dealing with. > > -STRING* is supposed to be a way for core hackers to avoid extra typing. > While you're at it, why not s/INTVAL/Parrot_Int/g? Hey, I was happy with INT and UINT. And P instead of Parrot. That would make it a PINT. So a short would be a HALFPINT. > -That's a damn big change. And it can only get bigger. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
