>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This is a singularly bad name, and needs to change. Probably >> C<KEY_PART> is better. It's a shame C<KEY_ELEMENT> is so confusing, >> since it's accurate. DS> AGGREGATE_INDEX is good, but awfully big. what about plain INDEX? or AGG_INDEX if you must. >> op arg, P1[1234] # Constant integer key >> op arg, P1[12.34] # Constant number key DS> Do we want floating point keys? Though I suppose there's no real DS> reason not to. i think they would just be cast to int or string. should that be in parrot or done at the language level and only int/string/reg are parrot level keys? uri -- Uri Guttman ------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------- http://www.stemsystems.com -- Stem is an Open Source Network Development Toolkit and Application Suite - ----- Stem and Perl Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding ---- Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org
