On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:

> At 07:15 PM 1/9/2002 +0000, Simon Glover wrote:
> >  OK, I think I've got it this time. The previous patch uncovered a bug in
> >  perlhash.pmc; index is actually the offset of a particular key pair
> >  within the perlhash structure, so we need to ensure that key->size is
> >  bigger than index.
> 
> This patch instead of, or in addition to, the previous?
> 
>                                       Dan

 In addition to. 

 Simon

Reply via email to