At 10:16 AM 12/31/2001 -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I started going through a lot of the warnings today and came across what looks
>like to be a far reaching issue.
>
>In well over half of the uses of INTVAL in structures and parameter passing,
>it seems to me that we really want unsigned ints instead. For example, all the
>unicode, size and length attributes should probably be unsigned. I'm willing
>to create a patch for this but considering the amount of work, I wanted to get
>some feedback first.
If you want to implement a UINTVAL, go for it. You'll beat me to it, and
that's fine. :)
As for the registers, I'd as soon they stay as they are--a single set of
signed ints. Larger stuff can live in nums or PMCs, or code can force 'em
to be unsigned as need be.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
