At 11:27 AM 12/8/2001 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Friday 07 December 2001 10:46 pm, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> > I need - er, strike that - really, really could use some absolute C type
> > abstraction (in addition to our current relative system).
> >
> > Any objections? Any objections to P_INTxx, P_UINTxx, and P_FLxx?
> > Something longer? (Don't want to upset the Language-Dev list again.)
Those are fine. I'm not yet convinced we need 'em, though.
>On a related note:
>
>Dan,
>
>$PDD_4 =~ s/\b[IU]V\b/INTVAL/g;
>$PDD_4 =~ s/\bNV\b/FLOATVAL/g;
>
>Don't know if you've updated them already, but they're this way on
>dev.perl.org.
Cool. Thanks.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
