On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 09:57, Sam Tregar wrote: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Brent Dax wrote: > > > What if I want my compiler to be lazy? Do you have the right to punish > > me for my laziness by making me add constant folding to my optimizer (or > > perhaps making me *write* an optimizer just to do constant folding)? > > Actually, a really lazy compiler will never use constants with anything > other than "set"! See the scheme compiler posted here last week for a > good example. >
I've got a dumb question, and its probably because I've not been paying attention, so I apologise in advance. How does a program access more than 32 variables simultaneously? In real CPU architectures you've got main memory storage, but here we only have registers. Brian
