To be honest, I'm a bit unhappy about all this: runops_t0p0b1_core, runops_t0p1b0_core, runops_t0p1b1_core, runops_t1p0b0_core, runops_t1p0b1_core, runops_t1p1b0_core, runops_t1p1b1_core
My feeling is that you get a fast runops core for normal use and a slow runops core which does everything else. If you're in "debugging mode", then an extra check to see whether or not you're profiling doesn't make much difference. As such, unless I hear a *very* good argument for duplicating and maintaining essentially the same code 7 times over, I'm going to rip out the slow cores and replace them with one single one. -- "How should I know if it works? That's what beta testers are for. I only coded it." (Attributed to Linus Torvalds, somewhere in a posting)
