At 03:41 PM 10/21/2001 -0400, Rocco Caputo wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 12:20:29PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > I suppose. I hadn't planned on inlining parrot assembly into any other
> > language. (The first person who suggests an asm() function *will* get
> > smacked... :) You'll certainly be able to use modules written purely in
> > parrot assembly.
>
>1. B::Parrot
>2. Parrot.xs
>3. Providing opcodes for libperl functions and linking it in.
Heck, something like:
use SomeParrotModule;
would be fine. If there's a SomeParrotModule.pbc, we'll use it.
>I haven't suggested asm(), so technically I'm safe. Right? :)
Yep.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
