On Fri, 2001-09-14 at 10:20, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Okay, we've had a number of people in favor of a good macro assembler for > Parrot. Given that, do we have anyone who'll volunteer to define, maintain, > and extend the thing? (Presuming we jump off of the current assembler, > which seems reasonable) > > There probably isn't a huge amount to do with the thing--maintain macro > substitutions, handle local labels, manage sub definitions, and suchlike > things. >
Wouldn't it largely be just filtering the input through cpp? Brian > Anyone? > > Dan > > --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- > Dan Sugalski even samurai > [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even > teddy bears get drunk
