On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 10:38:26PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > How about always allocating size+1 and stomping '\0' to the [size]th bytes? I'm trying to kill off that age-old C-ism and brainwash people into believing that a null in a string is just as significant as any other byte, so that it doesn't all go Horribly Wrong when it comes to implementing UTF-16, UTF-32 and transcodings. Simon -- Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. - Henry Spencer, University of Toronto Unix hack
- "Automated" Purify Run Josh Wilmes
- RE: "Automated" Purify Run Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- Re: "Automated" Purify Run Josh Wilmes
- RE: "Automated" Purify Run Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- Re: "Automated" Purify Run Josh Wilmes
- Re: "Automated" Purify Run Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: "Automated" Purify Run Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: "Automated" Purify Run Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- Re: "Automated" Purify Run Simon Cozens
- Re: "Automated" Purify Run Simon Cozens
- Re: "Automated" Purify Run Timur Safin
- Re: "Automated" Purify Run Simon Cozens
- Re: "Automated" Purify Run Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: "Automated" Purify Run Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs