there is something wrong with, uh, something...
Currently substr is named substr_s_s_i.
if I write substr_s_s_i S9, S1, I0, I1, all is good.
if I write substr S9, S1, I0, I1, I get an assembler error.
Questions:
* All opcodes include the destination register type in the name
why substr is diffeent?
* if I rename substr_s_s_i to substr_s_i_i, then the assembler
parses substr S9, S1, I0, I1 correctly, is the assembler wrong?
* if I rename substr_s_s_i to substr_s_s_i_i then the parser
does not parse substr S9, S1, I0, I1 correctly, is the assembler
wrong?
Regards
Mattia
