At 04:31 PM 9/18/2001 -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> So, yes, you'd get 'mul_i_ic_ic', but who cares? It's not really
>that hard to type, and it is absolutely unambiguous. If you want to make
>the interpreter magically deduce the full opcode name from the prefix,
>that's cool, too.
More to the point, it needs typing exactly twice--once in the .ops file
that defines the opcode function body, and once in opcode_table. The
assembler, of course, uses the smaller name.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
