At 05:49 PM 9/10/2001 -0700, Damien Neil wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:48:48PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 04:56 PM 9/10/2001 -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
> > >This patch seems to work on the FreeBSD box I have access to. Now to
> > >figure out what's causing all those 'use of uninitialized value at
> > >assembler.pl line 81' messages...
> >
> > It's the blank lines in opcode_table. The assembler (and disassembler) at
> > some point didn't grok 'em. Patches have been applied, but you might've
> > checked out before that happened.
>
>No, in this case, it's my fault. I didn't realize the assembler
>reads op name/number mappings out of interp_guts.h, so my patch
>broke the assembler.
Nothing should read out of interp_guts.h. That's autogenerated from
opcode_table. Or it was yesterday, but things might've changed. :)
>I'm thinking of writing something to generate a Parrot::Opcode.pm
>module, so code doesn't need to parse opcode_table and interp_guts.h.
>Sound reasonable?
Yes, please do. I knew we needed one the second time I needed to parse
opcode_table, I just haven't stopped long enough to be lazy and still
program. (In those cases I came to a full stop...)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
