--- "Bryan C. Warnock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wisely wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2001 01:08 pm, Simon Cozens wrote:
> > And in addition - why are we worrying about namespace
> collision RIGHT NOW?
> > Sure, when Parrot can be embedded, then we should
> ensure that our names
> > aren't going to clash. But who in their right minds is
> going to embed
> > Parrot in anything in its current state? (Leon, I said
> "in their right
> > minds")
> >
> > It's not a priority, compared to getting working code
> out there. We can
> > sort it out later.
>
> Oh, how many times have I heard that before?
>
> It's not a prioirty, but it's so much easier to walk the
> correct path from
> the start. Since it's all Parrot, it's even easier.
Hear, hear! I remember the pain in 5.005_5* of turning off
PERL_POLLUTE. I expect that there may still be CPAN modules
that won't build without manually defining it.
It's much better if we get it right from the start so that
there's less that we need to go back and fix.
-- BKS
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
