Dan wept: > I knew there was something bugging me about this. > > Allowing lexically scoped subs to spring into existence (and > variables, for that matter) will probably slow down sub and > variable access, since we can't safely resolve at compile time what > variable or sub is being accessed. > > [snippage] > > Not that I'm arguing against it, just that I can see some > efficiency issues. Understood. And that's why you get the big bucks. ;-) Damian
- RE: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Uri Guttman
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Me
- RE: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- RE: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- RE: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Ken Fox
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Ken Fox