From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > The real question, as I see it, is "Should we look > lexicals up by name?" And the answer is Yes. Larry's > decreed it, and it makes sense. (I'm half-tempted to > hack up something to let it be done in perl 5 > --wouldn't take much work) No need, if what you mean is: "Can I get at the values of lexicals in a Cv by name" Look at Robin Houston's PadWalker: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RO/ROBIN/ If you mean that you'd like to be able to replace what '$foo' points to within a scratchpad... That is still just an itch on Robin's ToDo list.
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dave Mitchell
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Garrett Goebel
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Bart Lateur
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Bart Lateur
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski