Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter

[Ken Fox]

Dan Sugalski wrote:
> For those of you worrying that parrot will be *just* low-level ops,
> don't. There will be medium and high level ops in the set as well.

I was going to cite <http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/romer96structure.html>,
but you guys have already read that, eh? ;)

One thing I was expecting was "bytecode subroutines are given opcodes."
Will there be a difference? Can we replace "built-in" opcodes with Perl
subs?

- Ken