Re: Opcode Dispatch

[Bryan C . Warnock]

On Monday 06 August 2001 09:16 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> It's probably the name causing problems. Unless things change, everything
> in the executable bits of parrot's bytecode stream will be 32 bits. We
> might drop that to 16 bits, but that puts a heavy burden on branches I'd
> as soon not have to deal with if we can avoid it.

Okay, I may be slow, but I make mistakes.  I'll probably rework it tonight.

-- 
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]