On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Adam Turoff wrote: > Don't laugh. It's here now. It's called XSLT. :-) Um, that's not what the article was talking about The proposal is to use an XML syntax to program in existing "VHLL" languages, including Perl. This would supposedly allow programmers to embed drawings as documentation as well as solve the age-old tab-setting and brace-style dilemas. Sure, program XSLT in XML. I guess that makes about as much sense as XSLT is ever going to. My question is, if you think programming Perl in XML is such a good idea, why not do it? If you think my answer is a straw man argument, then what's yours? -sam
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Dan Brian
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Austin Hastings
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Buddha Buck
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Buddha Buck