At 01:00 PM 7/7/2001 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>Would it make sense / be useful to have also distinct "between
>statements" callbacks?
Yup. For the debugger if nothing else, and it's a good place to put cleanup
code, so... I expect we'll have an "end of statement" opcode
>(Which reminds me of a clever hack Abigail once concocted to have code
>executed at *block* exits...)
We'll have those, too. End of scope has lots of potential cleanup, and I
don't see why we shouldn't let that be piggy-backed on. (And one of the C++
folks at the office brought something up recently that lent itself well to
end of block actions. I can't recall offhand what it was, but it would've
been nifty if perl could have done it reliably)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
