On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 01:47:39AM -0600, Dan Brian wrote: > > > Having it in the core, in C[++], would be that much more efficient, > > > and that much less of a hack. Maybe the tradeoff is that it > > > wouldn't work. :-) > > > > Everyone's making these assumptions, WHY WON'T ANYONE LOOK AT > > CLASS::OBJECT?! > > It might not work, Schwern. And even if it did, it might be really slow. > Somebody should write an implementation first, and then tackle efficiency. This is a joke, right? I'm on Candid Camera. -- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Michael Fowler
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? John Porter
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Brian
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? schwern
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Uri Guttman
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Adam Turoff
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Per-object inheritance in core a red herring? Dan Sugalski