Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I don't see where shadow functions are really necessary - >after all, no one has ever complained that you can't do > >pp_chomp(sv); /* or pp_add(sv1, sv2), for that matter */ > >in Perl 5. Yes we did. And note the doop.c file which is part answer to the shadows. Given the inner functions we could presumable generate the decode functions (c.f. xsubpp) -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Damien Neil
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Bart Lateur
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Uri Guttman
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski