> I just gave a few other variants a try-- passing a junction in a
variable, passing a code block containing a function-- without any
luck.
Sorry, I mean a code block containing a *junction* or course.
Like:
my @exclude = ( rx/<|w>mothera$/, rx/<|w>camel$/ );
my $any_exclude = any(@exclude);
my @files = find( dir => $loc, type => 'file', exclude => {
$any_exclude } );
say @files;
# ["/home/doom/tmp/monster_island/godzilla".IO
"/home/doom/tmp/monster_island/mothera".IO
"/home/doom/tmp/monster_island/rhodan".IO]
On 5/21/21, Joseph Brenner <doom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, yes the actual result is certainly consistent with the
> junction applied at the top level, and not internally, which is what I
> was expecting.
>
> Is there actually no way to pass a junction in to a function so that
> it can be used later in an internal smartmach? That's been my rough
> impression of what junctions are for, a way to have a compound value
> that's treated as a single one until it's used.
>
> I just gave a few other variants a try-- passing a junction in a
> variable, passing a code block containing a function-- without any
> luck.
>
