> On 17 Mar 2021, at 18:45, Richard Hainsworth <rnhainswo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have been running into this error: "Too many open files"
>
> Sorry for the lack of detail. The problem is that the error comes up in odd
> places, so I have found it difficult to golf down into Raku program that
> always fails with this error.
>
> When I separate out the code that leads to the error, and create another
> program, Raku handles it without difficulty. It seems to occur when there are
> a lot of moving parts, so to speak.
>
> I am not explicitly opening file handles, but the software I have written is
> using the idiom
>
> "some-filename.html".IO.spurt( $an-accumulated-string );
>
> Obviously, filehandles are being opened under the hood. Having written a
> file, there is no need to reference it again, so I could close the filehandle.
>
> I have been told that because of the way garbage handling is implemented,
> there is a problem with file handles.
That's should only happen if you specifically open a file to obtain an
IO::Handle: if you don't close it yourself (e.g. via a LEAVE block like: LEAVE
.close with $handle), *then* you run this risk, as the IO::Handle.DESTROY
method *will* close the handle, but you cannot be sure as to when
IO::Handle.DESTROY gets called.
> If so, what is a safer idiom to use in place of and IO on a string, so that
> the handle can be closed immediately after use?
The "filelame".IO.spurt($string)" is the exact idiom to ensure that file
handles are getting closed for you automatically. And I've just checked the
code: the OS file handle *is* specifically getting closed with an
nqp::closefh($!PIO). Specifically, the sequence is:
my $PIO := nqp::open($path,$mode);
nqp::writefh($PIO,nqp::decont(data));
nqp::closefh($PIO);
Now, you can't get more succinct than that: it doesn't even open an IO::Handle
at all!
The only thing I can think of at this moment, is that somehow nqp::closefh() is
leaking? Perhaps creating an issue for this, is in order!
Liz
