Agree.
That's why I did https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/d53a927331 earlier
today.
> On 11 Jan 2021, at 18:36, Richard Hainsworth <rnhainswo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I want to test for a key being defined in one hash, and if it is, then it
> should be a hash, and I need the value of that second key.
>
> So I was testing my syntax with raku and got the following:
>
> raku
> Welcome to ๐๐๐ค๐ฎ๐๐จโข v2020.12.
> Implementing the ๐๐๐ค๐ฎโข programming language v6.d.
> Built on MoarVM version 2020.12.
>
> To exit type 'exit' or '^D'
> > my %h = <one two three> Z=> 1..*
> {one => 1, three => 3, two => 2}
> > %h<five> = %( this-key => 'something' )
> {this-key => something}
> > my $x
> (Any)
> > with %h<five> { do with .<this-key> { $x = $_ } }
> something
> > with %h<five> { do with .<this-key> { $x = $_ } }
> ===SORRY!===
> Word 'with' interpreted as a listop; please use 'do with' to introduce the
> statement control word
> at line 4
> ------> $ = withโ %h<five> { do with .<this-key> { $x = $
> Unexpected block in infix position (two terms in a row)
> at line 4
> ------> $ = with %h<five>โ { do with .<this-key> { $x = $_ } };
>
> Note the lines begining with 'with'. Exactly the same line, executed twice,
> produces two significantly different answers.
>
> I think this shouldn't happen.
>
